Comparisons

Choosing a privacy-first analytics tool: what actually differs from Google Analytics

A practical, non-marketing comparison of what changes when you move off cookie-based analytics — and what to check before you switch.

By the Embaze team7 min read

Google Analytics (GA4) and the newer privacy-first tools — Embaze, Plausible, Fathom, Simple Analytics — aren't really competing on features. They're built on a different premise about what an analytics tool should be allowed to know about a visitor. Here's what actually changes if you switch, without the sales pitch.

Consent banners

GA4 sets a persistent client ID cookie by default, which is why every site running it needs a cookie consent banner under GDPR/ePrivacy rules. Cookie-free tools avoid that requirement because there's no persistent cross-session identifier to consent to. This isn't a loophole specific to any one tool — it's the standard basis every privacy-first analytics tool relies on, and it's why they all converge on a similar no-cookie architecture rather than it being a unique feature of one product.

One honest caveat: whether you can legally skip a consent banner entirely depends on what else your site does (ad pixels, other trackers, session replay tools) and your specific jurisdiction. This is general information, not legal advice for your situation.

Sampling

GA4 samples data on higher-traffic properties and in certain report views, meaning the numbers you see are a statistical estimate, not an exact count. Embaze's dashboard queries the raw events table directly for every number shown — visitors, pageviews, referrers, everything — with no sampling at any traffic volume, simply because the underlying query engine (Postgres) doesn't need to sample at the traffic levels a single site's events table would realistically hit.

Data ownership and portability

GA4 data lives in Google's infrastructure and feeds Google's advertising products by default. With Embaze, your events live in your own workspace and are yours to export; nothing is sold or shared with a third party for advertising.

What you give up

  • No cross-device or long-term identity resolution (see our post on how cookie-free tracking works)
  • No integration with Google Ads / Google's ad ecosystem — GA4's audience-sharing features have no equivalent here
  • A smaller feature surface overall — GA4's event/conversion modeling is far more elaborate, for teams that need that depth

If your actual use case is "how much traffic am I getting, where's it from, and what pages work" — the day-to-day question most sites actually have — a privacy-first tool answers it with less setup and no banner to maintain. If you need deep ad-attribution modeling across a large paid-acquisition funnel, GA4's extra complexity is there for a reason.